All the Times Israel Has Rejected Peace With Palestinians

Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced: James Baldwin

Israel prefers endless conflict to a Palestinian state.

ISRAEL HAS BEEN widely condemned for its brutal response to the October 7 terrorist attacks by Hamas. With the coming expiration of the ceasefire, this will only become more vociferous. But many U.S. supporters of Israel have responded to the criticism with a question: What else is the beleaguered country supposed to do? The answer is simple. Israel should do what it has never done before: agree to the establishment of a Palestinian state, based on international law.

This straightforward statement is scarce in mainstream U.S. political culture. In the speeches of politicians and in newspaper op-eds, it’s a matter of faith that Israel has always yearned for peace but has been constantly rebuffed by the Palestinians. The Palestinians, according to this narrative, prefer holding onto a dream of destroying Israel.

This is not quite 180 degrees the opposite of reality, but close. In the actual world outside of high-level American political rhetoric, Israel could have had peace at many times in the past 75 years. However, such a peace would have required Israel giving up most of the Palestinian land — specifically, Gaza and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem — it conquered in the Six-Day War in 1967. Israel has always preferred conflict with stateless Palestinians to that.

Amos Malka, one-time head of Israeli military intelligence, explained it straightforwardly in 2004. “It is possible to reach an agreement,” he said, “under the following conditions: a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital and sovereignty on the Temple Mount; 97 percent of the West Bank plus exchanges of territory in the ratio of 1:1 with respect to the remaining territory; some kind of formula that includes the acknowledgement of Israel’s responsibility for the refugee problem and a willingness to accept 20,000-30,000 refugees.”

In polite circles of U.S. power, these facts are considered preposterous. Anyone describing them exiles themselves from serious discussion of the issue. It’s similar to the situation before the invasion of Iraq, when there was uniform agreement across the political spectrum that Iraq possessed so-called weapons of mass destruction. Any claims to the contrary were seen as self-evidently ludicrous, as ludicrous as now saying that Israel is a huge obstacle to peace….

https://theintercept.com/2023/11/28/israel-palestine-history-peace/

*************************************************

Israel wants to slay the monster next door, but with this lethal bombardment, it is feeding it

Repeal the Exclusionary Nation-state Law, for the Sake of All Israelis

A Brief History of the Netanyahu-Hamas Alliance

Gaza is the terrifying Dystopia sci-fi writers warned you about

By Trying to Humiliate Gaza to Its Core, Israel Is the One Being Humiliated

It’s Time to Confront Israel’s Version of “From the River to the Sea”

United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

Dogs of war / New acronym in Gaza: WCNSF – Wounded Child No Surviving Family

Patrick Lawrence: Deeper Into Depravity

A Conspiracy of Silence / The Killing Floor of Gaza