Progressive and revolutionary movements of the 1970s, which took place across the globe, provide an inspiring and useful guide for contemporary radical political thought and action, even more than those of the 1960s. The sixties were a crucial historical turning point and we can certainly learn from those movements, both the victorious and the vanquished, but, fundamentally, they marked the end of an era. The seventies, in contrast, herald the beginning of our time. In response to the insurgencies of the sixties, new structures of power, many of which are now grouped under the name “neoliberalism,” were tested and institutionalized, and are essentially the same ones that rule over us today.
The progressive and revolutionary struggles of the seventies, then, constituted an initial set of experiments for confronting our current conjuncture, a first test of the terrain. Feminist and gay liberation movements, worker and anticolonial struggles, and antinuclear and antiracist projects, along with many other liberation efforts developed in the seventies, offer us not only initial analyses of today’s structures of economic and political domination but also forms of critique and resistance most effective against them.
***********************************************
Political philosopher Hardt (Assembly) offers an incisive reassessment of global radical movements of the 1970s—an often maligned decade in histories of leftist politics. According to Hardt, the ’70s is when “neoliberal discipline and control” developed as a response to the popular uprising of the 1960s. However, it is also the decade when agitators for political change, under the pressure of being considered “subversives” by governments, first innovated many of the 20th century’s most enduring tools of political resistance.
Hardt’s wide-ranging analysis includes Islamic Liberation Theology, the Weather Underground bombings, and Italy’s “proletarian shopping sprees,” when large organized groups would take items from stores without paying. He focuses on evolving tactics: for example, armed militants in Germany and Italy discovered that direct combat with the state robbed them of legitimacy in the eyes of the public; and French watchmakers in the town of Lip took over their factory and inaugurated a pathbreaking experiment in workers’ self-management, but failed to achieve official recognition, revealing the futility of attempts at ground-up change without the backing of a wider social movement. (He points to worker takeovers in Chile and Portugal that were longer lasting because of the context of widespread upheaval in which they occurred.). Hardt builds powerful connections across diverse regions and histories. The result is a striking theoretical take on the murky politics of an ill-defined era.
https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-197-67465-9
******************************************************
Mohammed Hanif: The rest of the world has had it with US presidents, Trump or otherwise
Eric Toussaint: Concerning the founding of the Bretton Woods’ Institutions
Lee Camp: The Dark Secret History of Capitalism
Noam Chomsky: Savage capitalist lunatics are running the asylum
Big Tech is failing. The future of democracy depends on what happens next
Robert Urquhart: Capital accumulation as eternal recurrence: theology of the bad infinity
Understanding Capitalism
After the truth-shower 