Gujarat court acquits former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt in custodial torture case

NB: A welcome and good judgment. Given the glaring procedural anomalies (highlighted below) and lack of evidence in this case, one has to ask how and why the original conviction was arrived at or obtained, in the first place. Will there be any restitution to this ex police officer? Was he punished for testifying against powerful people? We should all think carefully about what is happening to India’s criminal justice system DS

Bhatt was earlier sentenced to life imprisonment in a 1990 custodial death case in Jamnagar and 20 years in jail in a 1996 case relating to planting drugs to frame a Rajasthan-based lawyer in Palanpur.

A court in Gujarat’s Porbandar has acquitted former IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt in a 1997 custodial torture case, citing that the prosecution could not “prove the case beyond reasonable doubt”.

Additional chief judicial magistrate Mukesh Pandya on Saturday acquitted Bhatt, the then superintendent of police (SP) of Porbandar, in a case registered against him under the IPC sections pertaining to causing grievous hurt to obtain confession and other provisions by giving him the benefit of the doubt due to lack of evidence.

Bhatt was earlier sentenced to life imprisonment in a 1990 custodial death case in Jamnagar and 20 years in jail in a 1996 case relating to planting drugs to frame a Rajasthan-based lawyer in Palanpur. He is currently lodged in the Rajkot Central Jail.

The court held that the prosecution could not “prove the case beyond reasonable doubt” that the complainant was forced to confess to the crime and made to surrender by voluntarily causing pain using dangerous weapons and threats.

It also noted that the sanction required to prosecute the accused, who was then a public servant discharging his duty, had not been obtained in the case.

Bhatt and constable Vajubhai Chau, against whom the case was abated after his death, were charged under Sections 330 (causing hurt to extort confession) and 324 (causing hurt with dangerous weapons) of the Indian Penal Code on the complaint by one Naran Jadav for causing him physical and mental torture in police custody to extract confession in a Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) and Arms Act case.

A first information report was filed against Bhatt and Chau in a Porbandar city B-division police station on April 15, 2013, following the court’s direction on Jadav’s complaint before a magistrate court on July 6, 1997.

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/india/gujarat-court-acquits-former-ips-officer-sanjiv-bhatt-in-custodial-torture-case/

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Rahul Pandita: What I learned from G. N. Saibaba

Lowering the Bar

A Family Breaks Its Silence: Shocking Details Emerge In death of presiding judge in Sohrabuddin Trial

Apoorva Mandhani: Judge Loya’s Confidants Died Mysterious Deaths

Constitutional principles go for a toss in the criminal law of search and seizure

Death of Judge Loya: A critical examination of the ECG and post-mortem demonstrates the failings of the Supreme Court verdict

Father Stan Swamy To Posthumously Receive Human Rights Honorary Award At Geneva Today

Patricia Mukhim: Nagaland’s people deserve neither AFSPA nor gun culture

Bhima Koregaon: Kin of jailed activists write to authorities to not discontinue telephone calls / How the ‘anda cell’ is used to discipline prison inmates

Bhima Koregaon case: Bombay HC grants default bail to Sudha Bharadwaj, but declines the same to eight other accused

JYOTI PUNWANI: How 5 Reliance Workers Fighting For A Better Deal Found Themselves In Jail On Terrorism Charges

Sanjiv Krishan Sood: It Is the Need of the Hour To Understand Police Brutality in India and Take Action

Here are SC, HC judges with political pasts. Gowri’s unconstitutional views were the problem

Ravish Kumar: अरुण गोयल का चुनाव आयोग से इस्तीफ़ा | Arun Goel resigns from the Election Commission

The Oceanic Circle: Talk on the occasion of Mahatma Gandhi’s 155th birthday